[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220406100612.2nuvjcc2oxo54n5j@houat>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 12:06:12 +0200
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>
To: "Zhengbin (OSKernel)" <zhengbin13@...wei.com>
Cc: emma@...olt.net, airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tangyizhou@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -next] drm/vc4: Fix build error when CONFIG_DRM_VC4=y
&& CONFIG_RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE=m
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022 at 10:22:11AM +0800, Zhengbin (OSKernel) wrote:
> On 2022/3/25 21:05, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 10:18:31AM +0800, Zheng Bin wrote:
> > > If CONFIG_DRM_VC4=y, CONFIG_RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE=m, CONFIG_COMPILE_TEST=n,
> > > bulding fails:
> > >
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/vc4_drv.o: In function `vc4_drm_bind':
> > > vc4_drv.c:(.text+0x320): undefined reference to `rpi_firmware_get'
> > > vc4_drv.c:(.text+0x320): relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 against undefined symbol `rpi_firmware_get'
> > > vc4_drv.c:(.text+0x34c): undefined reference to `rpi_firmware_property'
> > > vc4_drv.c:(.text+0x34c): relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 against undefined symbol `rpi_firmware_property'
> > > vc4_drv.c:(.text+0x354): undefined reference to `rpi_firmware_put'
> > > vc4_drv.c:(.text+0x354): relocation truncated to fit: R_AARCH64_CALL26 against undefined symbol `rpi_firmware_put'
> > >
> > > Make DRM_VC4 depends on RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE || COMPILE_TEST to fix this.
> > >
> > > Fixes: c406ad5e4a85 ("drm/vc4: Notify the firmware when DRM is in charge")
> > > Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Zheng Bin <zhengbin13@...wei.com>
> > > ---
> > > v2: follow Maxime's advise, add RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE as an additional depends
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/Kconfig b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/Kconfig
> > > index de3424fed2fc..92d74ba7c449 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/Kconfig
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vc4/Kconfig
> > > @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
> > > config DRM_VC4
> > > tristate "Broadcom VC4 Graphics"
> > > depends on ARCH_BCM || ARCH_BCM2835 || COMPILE_TEST
> > > + depends on RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE || COMPILE_TEST
> > Why do we need the || COMPILE_TEST here?
> >
> > The rpi_firmware_get, _property and _put functions aren't define if
> > RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE, so we need that dependency every time, even if
> > COMPILE_TEST is set?
>
> include/soc/bcm2835/raspberrypi-firmware.h
>
> #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE)
>
> struct rpi_firmware *rpi_firmware_get(struct device_node
> *firmware_node);/_property/_put
>
> #else -->empty function
>
> static inline struct rpi_firmware *rpi_firmware_get(struct device_node
> *firmware_node)/_property/_put
> {
> return NULL;
> }
> #endif
>
>
> We can refer to drivers/pwm/Kconfig
>
> config PWM_RASPBERRYPI_POE
> tristate "Raspberry Pi Firwmware PoE Hat PWM support"
> # Make sure not 'y' when RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE is 'm'. This can only
> # happen when COMPILE_TEST=y, hence the added !RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE.
> depends on RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE || (COMPILE_TEST &&
> !RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE) -->There is no need to add (&&
> !RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE)
Oh, so you're fixing the case where vc4 would be built-in, but the
firmware driver a module?
I guess that makes sense, but the comment definitely helps there. And
the (COMPILE_TEST && !RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE) is also needed, since it
wouldn't fix the issue you're trying to fix for COMPILE_TEST otherwise.
Maxime
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists