linux-kernel - [RFC 2/3] softirq: Do throttling when softirqs use up its bandwidth

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220406025241.191300-3-liaochang1@huawei.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Apr 2022 10:52:40 +0800
From:   Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>
To:     <mcgrof@...nel.org>, <keescook@...omium.org>, <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
        <liaochang1@...wei.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <clg@...d.org>,
        <nitesh@...hat.com>, <edumazet@...gle.com>, <peterz@...radead.org>,
        <joshdon@...gle.com>, <masahiroy@...nel.org>, <nathan@...nel.org>,
        <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        <gustavoars@...nel.org>, <arnd@...db.de>, <chris@...isdown.name>,
        <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>, <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        <daniel@...earbox.net>, <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
        <will@...nel.org>, <dave@...olabs.net>, <frederic@...nel.org>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <heying24@...wei.com>, <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
        <weiyongjun1@...wei.com>
Subject: [RFC 2/3] softirq: Do throttling when softirqs use up its bandwidth

When kernel is about to handle pending softirqs, it will check firstly
whether softirq already use up its CPU bandwidth, Once the total duration
of softirq handling exceed the max value in the user-specified time window,
softirq will be throttled for a while, the throttling will be removed
when time window expires.

On then other hand, kernel will update the runtime of softirq on given CPU
before __do_softirq() function returns.

Signed-off-by: Liao Chang <liaochang1@...wei.com>
---
 kernel/softirq.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
index 8aac9e2631fd..6de6db794ac5 100644
--- a/kernel/softirq.c
+++ b/kernel/softirq.c
@@ -75,6 +75,49 @@ struct softirq_throttle {
 	raw_spinlock_t lock;
 } si_throttle;
 
+struct softirq_runtime {
+	bool	throttled;
+	unsigned long	duration;
+	unsigned long	expires;
+	raw_spinlock_t lock;
+};
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct softirq_runtime, softirq_runtime);
+
+static void forward_softirq_expires(struct softirq_runtime *si_runtime)
+{
+	si_runtime->throttled = false;
+	si_runtime->duration = 0UL;
+	si_runtime->expires = jiffies +
+		msecs_to_jiffies(si_throttle.period - si_throttle.runtime);
+}
+
+static void update_softirq_runtime(unsigned long duration)
+{
+	struct softirq_runtime *si_runtime = this_cpu_ptr(&softirq_runtime);
+
+	raw_spin_lock(&si_runtime->lock);
+	si_runtime->duration += jiffies_to_msecs(duration);
+	if ((si_runtime->duration >= si_throttle.runtime) &&
+		time_before(jiffies, si_runtime->expires)) {
+		si_runtime->throttled = true;
+	}
+	raw_spin_unlock(&si_runtime->lock);
+}
+
+static bool softirq_runtime_exceeded(void)
+{
+	struct softirq_runtime *si_runtime = this_cpu_ptr(&softirq_runtime);
+
+	if ((unsigned int)si_throttle.runtime >= si_throttle.period)
+		return false;
+
+	raw_spin_lock(&si_runtime->lock);
+	if (!time_before(jiffies, si_runtime->expires))
+		forward_softirq_expires(si_runtime);
+	raw_spin_unlock(&si_runtime->lock);
+	return si_runtime->throttled;
+}
+
 static int softirq_throttle_validate(void)
 {
 	if (((int)sysctl_softirq_period_ms <= 0) ||
@@ -88,10 +131,18 @@ static int softirq_throttle_validate(void)
 static void softirq_throttle_update(void)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
+	struct softirq_runtime *si_runtime;
 
 	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&si_throttle.lock, flags);
 	si_throttle.period = sysctl_softirq_period_ms;
 	si_throttle.runtime = sysctl_softirq_runtime_ms;
+
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu, &) {
+		si_runtime = per_cpu_ptr(&softirq_runtime, cpu);
+		raw_spin_lock(&si_runtime->lock);
+		forward_softirq_expires(si_runtime);
+		raw_spin_unlock(&si_runtime->lock);
+	}
 	raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&si_throttle.lock, flags);
 }
 
@@ -129,9 +180,17 @@ int softirq_throttle_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, void *buffer,
 
 static void softirq_throttle_init(void)
 {
+	struct softirq_runtime *si_runtime;
+
 	si_throttle.period = sysctl_softirq_period_ms;
 	si_throttle.runtime = sysctl_softirq_runtime_ms;
 	raw_spin_lock_init(&si_throttle.lock);
+
+	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+		si_runtime = per_cpu_ptr(&softirq_runtime, cpu);
+		forward_softirq_expires(si_runtime);
+		raw_spin_lock_init(&si_runtime->lock);
+	}
 }
 #endif
 
@@ -592,6 +651,13 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __softirq_entry __do_softirq(void)
 	__u32 pending;
 	int softirq_bit;
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SOFTIRQ_THROTTLE
+	bool exceeded = softirq_runtime_exceeded();
+
+	if (exceeded)
+		return;
+#endif
+
 	/*
 	 * Mask out PF_MEMALLOC as the current task context is borrowed for the
 	 * softirq. A softirq handled, such as network RX, might set PF_MEMALLOC
@@ -652,6 +718,10 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __softirq_entry __do_softirq(void)
 		wakeup_softirqd();
 	}
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_SOFTIRQ_THROTTLE
+	update_softirq_runtime(jiffies - (end - MAX_SOFTIRQ_TIME));
+#endif
+
 	account_softirq_exit(current);
 	lockdep_softirq_end(in_hardirq);
 	softirq_handle_end();
-- 
2.17.1