[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Yk2I7JXzXaXi+6R1@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 15:34:52 +0300
From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Richard Fitzgerald <rf@...nsource.cirrus.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.15 327/913] lib: uninline simple_strntoull() as well
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 09:23:09AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 839b395eb9c13ae56ea5fc3ca9802734a72293f0 ]
>
> Codegen become bloated again after simple_strntoull() introduction
>
> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/4 up/down: 0/-224 (-224)
> -static unsigned long long simple_strntoull(const char *startp, size_t max_chars,
> - char **endp, unsigned int base)
> +static noinline unsigned long long simple_strntoull(const char *startp, size_t max_chars, char **endp, unsigned int base)
This patch doesn't fix any bugs, why it is selected?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists