[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bf6d645d9c8d0cc0ada530d9a3ebf27df838cc52.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 20:49:32 +0800
From: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@...iatek.com>
To: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
CC: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <fan.chen@...iatek.com>,
<louis.yu@...iatek.com>, <roger.lu@...iatek.com>,
<Allen-yy.Lin@...iatek.com>,
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
<hsinyi@...gle.com>,
Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@...iatek.corp-partner.google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] dt-bindings: cpufreq: mediatek: add mt8186 cpufreq
dt-bindings
On Thu, 2022-03-10 at 14:44 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 08:21:49PM +0800, Tim Chang wrote:
> > 1. add cci property.
> > 2. add example of MT8186.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <
> > jia-wei.chang@...iatek.corp-partner.google.com>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-mediatek.yaml | 41
> > +++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-
> > mediatek.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-
> > mediatek.yaml
> > index 584946eb3790..d3ce17fd8fcf 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-
> > mediatek.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/cpufreq/cpufreq-
> > mediatek.yaml
> > @@ -48,6 +48,10 @@ properties:
> > When absent, the voltage scaling flow is handled by
> > hardware, hence no
> > software "voltage tracking" is needed.
> >
> > + cci:
> > + description:
> > + Phandle of the cci to be linked with the phandle of CPU if
> > present.
>
> We already have a binding for this. See cci-control-port.
Hi Rob,
Pardon me for my late reply.
It seems that "cci-control-port" is hardware IP from ARM.
But mediatek-cpufreq uses MTK internal CCI hardware IP.
I think I should keep this change here.
Thanks.
>
> > +
> > "#cooling-cells":
> > description:
> > For details, please refer to
Powered by blists - more mailing lists