linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] regulator/rpi-panel-attiny: Get rid of duplicate of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yk2R5el6fUm4FQo5@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 6 Apr 2022 14:13:09 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Detlev Casanova <detlev.casanova@...labora.com>,
        Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] regulator/rpi-panel-attiny: Get rid of duplicate
 of_node assignment

On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 04:01:41PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2022 at 08:45:08PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > GPIO library does copy the of_node from the parent device of
> > the GPIO chip, there is no need to repeat this in the individual
> > drivers. Remove these assignment all at once.
> > 
> > For the details one may look into the of_gpio_dev_init() implementation.
> 
> Any comments on this? Can it be applied now?

Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
for the subsystem are normally handled.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)