linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Return the busiest group only if imbalance is meaningful

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKfTPtDh7qFpdjsEBvT34WEgW8uGbdwsZnyXjq4KpAcOse9Pew@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Apr 2022 14:59:05 +0200
From:   Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To:     zgpeng <zgpeng.linux@...il.com>
Cc:     mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
        mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Return the busiest group only if imbalance is meaningful

On Wed, 6 Apr 2022 at 13:23, zgpeng <zgpeng.linux@...il.com> wrote:
>
> When calculate_imbalance function calculate the imbalance, it may
> actually get a negative number. In this case, it is meaningless to

We should not return a negative imbalance but I suppose this can
happen when we are using the avg_load metrics to calculate imbalance.
Have you faced a use case where imbalance is negative ?

> return the so-called busiest group and continue to search for the
> busiest cpu later. Therefore, only when the imbalance is greater
> than 0 should return the busiest group, otherwise return NULL.
>
> Signed-off-by: zgpeng <zgpeng@...cent.com>
> Reviewed-by: Samuel Liao <samuelliao@...cent.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/fair.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 601f8bd..9f75303 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -9639,7 +9639,7 @@ static struct sched_group *find_busiest_group(struct lb_env *env)
>  force_balance:
>         /* Looks like there is an imbalance. Compute it */
>         calculate_imbalance(env, &sds);
> -       return env->imbalance ? sds.busiest : NULL;
> +       return env->imbalance > 0 ? sds.busiest : NULL;
>
>  out_balanced:
>         env->imbalance = 0;
> --
> 2.9.5
>