[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f3b6524f899f2775e630dee2ad1cc4c4c389b2fe.camel@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2022 14:13:04 -0700
From: Seth Heasley <seth.heasley@...el.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
seth.heasley@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: ismt: Remove useless DMA-32 fallback configuration
On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 15:31 +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 01:29:45PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > As stated in [1], dma_set_mask() with a 64-bit mask never fails if
> > dev->dma_mask is non-NULL.
> > So, if it fails, the 32 bits case will also fail for the same
> > reason.
> >
> >
> > Simplify code and remove some dead code accordingly.
> >
> > [1]: https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/6/7/398
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
Reviewed-by: Seth Heasley <seth.heasley@...el.com>
>
> Seth, Neil, do you agree?
Yes, I agree this change makes sense.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ismt.c | 7 ++-----
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ismt.c
> > b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ismt.c
> > index f4820fd3dc13..951f3511afaa 100644
> > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ismt.c
> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-ismt.c
> > @@ -920,11 +920,8 @@ ismt_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const struct
> > pci_device_id *id)
> >
> > err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> > if (err) {
> > - err = dma_set_mask_and_coherent(&pdev->dev,
> > DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> > - if (err) {
> > - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dma_set_mask fail\n");
> > - return -ENODEV;
> > - }
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "dma_set_mask fail\n");
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > }
> >
> > err = ismt_dev_init(priv);
> > --
> > 2.32.0
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists