[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220405120848.GV15609@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 14:08:48 +0200
From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Folio fixes for 5.18
On Fri, Apr 01, 2022 at 07:54:59PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> A mixture of odd changes that didn't quite make it into the original
> pull and fixes for things that did. Also the readpages changes had to
> wait for the NFS tree to be pulled first.
>
> The following changes since commit d888c83fcec75194a8a48ccd283953bdba7b2550:
>
> fs: fix fd table size alignment properly (2022-03-29 23:29:18 -0700)
>
> are available in the Git repository at:
>
> git://git.infradead.org/users/willy/pagecache.git tags/folio-5.18d
>
> for you to fetch changes up to 5a60542c61f3cce6e5dff2a38c8fb08a852a517b:
>
> btrfs: Remove a use of PAGE_SIZE in btrfs_invalidate_folio() (2022-04-01 14:40:44 -0400)
Matthew, can you please always CC linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org for any
patches that touch code under fs/btrfs? I've only noticed your folio
updates in this pull request. Some of the changes are plain API switch,
that's fine but I want to know about that, some changes seem to slightly
modify logic that I'd really like to review and there are several missed
opportunities to fix coding style. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists