linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V9 4/6] regulator: Add a regulator driver for the PM8008 PMIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yk21pdu16lyR8jXm@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Wed, 6 Apr 2022 16:45:41 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Satya Priya <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, quic_collinsd@...cinc.com,
        quic_subbaram@...cinc.com, quic_jprakash@...cinc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 4/6] regulator: Add a regulator driver for the PM8008
 PMIC

On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 08:23:11AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Mark Brown (2022-04-06 00:31:45)

> > It's a MFD function driver isn't it?

> The DT binding shows a single i2c node at i2c address 0x9. The
> compatible for it is "qcom,pm8008-regulators". It looks like an i2c
> device that is dedicated to providing regulators. I'd only expect to see
> an MFD if the device responding at i2c address 0x9 supported more than
> just regulators.

There's a MFD parent for it, and if it's for an I2C device for a pm8008
why would it have a -regulators in the name?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)