lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 6 Apr 2022 19:47:11 +0000
From:   Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
To:     Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
CC:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 1/2] ipv6: add missing tx timestamping on IPPROTO_RAW

On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 03:45:14PM -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2022 at 3:30 PM Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com> wrote:
> >
> > From: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> >
> > [ Upstream commit fbfb2321e950918b430e7225546296b2dcadf725 ]
> >
> > Raw sockets support tx timestamping, but one case is missing.
> >
> > IPPROTO_RAW takes a separate packet construction path. raw_send_hdrinc
> > has an explicit call to sock_tx_timestamp, but rawv6_send_hdrinc does
> > not. Add it.
> >
> > Fixes: 11878b40ed5c ("net-timestamp: SOCK_RAW and PING timestamping")
> > Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
> > Acked-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> > Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>
> 
> For 4.14.y cherry-pick:
> 
> Acked-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>

Thanks.

> Might be good to point out that this is not only a clean cherry-pick
> of the one-line patch, but has to include part of commit a818f75e311c
> ("net: ipv6: Hook into time based transmission") to plumb the
> sockcm_cookie. The rest of that patch is not a candidate for stable,
> so LGTM.

Point out how?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ