[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220406200010.GE594699@darkstar.musicnaut.iki.fi>
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2022 23:00:10 +0300
From: Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@....fi>
To: Janusz Krzysztofik <jmkrzyszt@...il.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@...an.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...il.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: OMAP1: Prepare for conversion of OMAP1 clocks to
CCF
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 08:48:14PM +0200, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> Dnia środa, 6 kwietnia 2022 15:21:49 CEST Aaro Koskinen pisze:
> > On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 10:17:49PM +0100, Janusz Krzysztofik wrote:
> > > Dnia wtorek, 22 marca 2022 20:07:53 CET Aaro Koskinen pisze:
> > > > On Tue, Mar 22, 2022 at 06:36:48PM +0200, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> > > > > Something is still broken. When doing kexec (using CCF kernel), the
> > > > > kexec'ed kernel now hangs early (on 770):
> > > > [...]
> > > > > [ 0.928863] calling omap1_init_devices+0x0/0x2c @ 1
> > > >
> > > > It hangs in omap_sram_reprogram_clock() (<- omap1_select_table_rate()
> > > > <- omap1_clk_late_init()).
> > >
> > > I've reviewed my changes but haven't found anything suspicious.
> >
> > The below change is fixing the kexec boot. Based on the comment in the
> > code, it seems this clock is needed for the SRAM to work.
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock_data.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock_data.c
> > index e33e11f826af..b8b4876ff935 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock_data.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/clock_data.c
> > @@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static struct omap1_clk tc1_ck = {
> > */
> >
> > static struct omap1_clk tc2_ck = {
> > - .hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT("tc2_ck", "tc_ck", &omap1_clk_gate_ops, 0),
> > + .hw.init = CLK_HW_INIT("tc2_ck", "tc_ck", &omap1_clk_gate_ops, CLK_IS_CRITICAL),
> > .ops = &clkops_generic,
> > .enable_reg = OMAP1_IO_ADDRESS(ARM_IDLECT3),
> > .enable_bit = EN_TC2_CK,
> >
> > A.
> >
>
> Thank you Aaro. Will you submit this as a separate fix, or should I submit
> v2 of my patch 4/4 with your fix included?
Please send a new version with the fix included.
A.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists