linux-kernel - RE: [RFC PATCH 5/5] x86/mce: Handle AMD threshold interrupt storms

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b140590dadea411ca3641b0537bfcd9f@intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 6 Apr 2022 22:44:13 +0000
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
        "Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>
CC:     "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
        Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH 5/5] x86/mce: Handle AMD threshold interrupt storms

+		/* Return early on an interrupt storm */
+		if (this_cpu_read(bank_storm[bank]))
+			return;

Is you reasoning for early return that you already have plenty of
logged errors from this bank, so OK to skip additional processing
of this one?

-Tony