[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkzJN6kKMenpT0mm@google.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 22:56:55 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>, Marc Orr <marcorr@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4] KVM, SEV: Add KVM_EXIT_SYSTEM_EVENT metadata for
SEV-ES
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022, Peter Gonda wrote:
> SEV-ES guests can request termination using the GHCB's MSR protocol. See
> AMD's GHCB spec section '4.1.13 Termination Request'. Currently when a
> guest does this the userspace VMM sees an KVM_EXIT_UNKNOWN (-EVINAL)
s/EVINAL/EINVAL
> return code from KVM_RUN. By adding a KVM_EXIT_SYSTEM_EVENT to kvm_run
> struct the userspace VMM can clearly see the guest has requested a SEV-ES
> termination including the termination reason code set and reason code.
Nit, phrase that last part as a command, nowhere in the changelog is it actually
stated that the patch converts to use KVM_EXIT_SYSTEM_EVENT.
And my personal preference is to lead with the "what", especially when there's
already a fair amount of assumed knowledge, e.g. someone that's familiar with
SEV-ES probably already knows the guest can request termination, or at least won't
be surprised by the news, whereas leading with the SEV-ES and GHCB info is just
going to add to the confusion of someone who's clueless about SEV-ES.
If an SEV-ES guest requests termination, exit to userspace with
KVM_EXIT_SYSTEM_EVENT and a dedicated SEV_TERM type instead of -EINVAL
so that userspace can take appropriate action.
See AMD's GHCB spec section '4.1.13 Termination Request' for more details.
> Signed-off-by: Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
> Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
> Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
> Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
> Cc: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>
> Cc: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
> Cc: Marc Orr <marcorr@...gle.com>
> Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>
> ---
>
> V4
> * Switch to using KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT exit reason.
>
> V3
> * Add Documentation/ update.
> * Updated other KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN exits to clear ndata and set reason
> to KVM_SHUTDOWN_REQ.
>
> V2
> * Add KVM_CAP_EXIT_SHUTDOWN_REASON check for KVM_CHECK_EXTENSION.
>
> Tested by making an SEV-ES guest call sev_es_terminate() with hardcoded
> reason code set and reason code and then observing the codes from the
> userspace VMM in the kvm_run.system_event fields.
>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c | 7 +++++--
> include/uapi/linux/kvm.h | 1 +
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> index 75fa6dd268f0..039b241a9fb5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/sev.c
> @@ -2735,8 +2735,11 @@ static int sev_handle_vmgexit_msr_protocol(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> pr_info("SEV-ES guest requested termination: %#llx:%#llx\n",
> reason_set, reason_code);
>
> - ret = -EINVAL;
> - break;
> + vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_SHUTDOWN;
Wrong exit reason.
> + vcpu->run->system_event.type = KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SEV_TERM;
> + vcpu->run->system_event.flags = control->ghcb_gpa;
> +
> + return 0;
> }
> default:
> /* Error, keep GHCB MSR value as-is */
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> index 8616af85dc5d..d9d24db12930 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kvm.h
> @@ -444,6 +444,7 @@ struct kvm_run {
> #define KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SHUTDOWN 1
> #define KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_RESET 2
> #define KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_CRASH 3
> +#define KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SEV_TERM 4
> __u32 type;
> __u64 flags;
@type isn't properly padded, so this needs to be changed when using flags. And
we definitely want to grab more room than just a single u64.
Per Paolo and I's combined powers[*], use bit 31 of the type to enumerate that ndata
is valid, and then change the sub-struct to:
struct {
#define KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SHUTDOWN 1
#define KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_RESET 2
#define KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_CRASH 3
#define KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SEV_TERM 4
#define KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_NDATA_VALID (1u << 31)
__u32 type;
__u32 ndata;
__u64 data[16];
} system_event;
[*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/e0285020-49d9-8168-be4d-90940a30a048@redhat.com
> } system_event;
> --
> 2.35.1.1094.g7c7d902a7c-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists