[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220405093859.05660166@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 09:38:59 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, kbuild-all@...ts.01.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: stackleak_erase()+0x35: call to
ftrace_likely_update() leaves .noinstr.text section
On Tue, 5 Apr 2022 10:03:35 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > I think I'll just send a patch to nuke the tracer. I'm sure Peter Zijlstra
> > will be happy when I do that. But I still want the profiler, as I find that
> > useful.
>
> It'll explode the moment Lai's entry rework goes through. That'll make
> us run C code before we switch to the kernel address space, so your
> counters will not exist/be-mapped and *BOOM*.
We could black list those areas. Just add:
#define DISABLE_BRANCH_PROFILING at the top of any file and it will not
do the profiling.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists