[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YkzF4/e86qwcuXiA@xz-m1.local>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 18:42:43 -0400
From: Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Alistair Popple <apopple@...dia.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/23] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs
On Tue, Apr 05, 2022 at 03:16:16PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 21:46:23 -0400 Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> > This is v8 of the series to add shmem+hugetlbfs support for userfaultfd
> > write protection.
>
> Various compilation catastrophes with x86_64 allnoconfig. I poked at
> the include ordering for a while but other things quickly became more
> attractive ;)
Sorry about that. I still don't know what's the problem, but I'll give it
a shot soon.
I think I only tried out with the new configs but not all the rest configs.
I thought there're some bot looking after that one, from which I used to
receive build reports. And IIRC I fixed some build issues in early versions
from those reports. Maybe I was wrong..
Any more hints on the latter?
Thanks,
--
Peter Xu
Powered by blists - more mailing lists