lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 09:32:11 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org, Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>, Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Subject: [PATCH 5.15 869/913] Reinstate some of "swiotlb: rework "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE"" From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> commit 901c7280ca0d5e2b4a8929fbe0bfb007ac2a6544 upstream. Halil Pasic points out [1] that the full revert of that commit (revert in bddac7c1e02b), and that a partial revert that only reverts the problematic case, but still keeps some of the cleanups is probably better.  And that partial revert [2] had already been verified by Oleksandr Natalenko to also fix the issue, I had just missed that in the long discussion. So let's reinstate the cleanups from commit aa6f8dcbab47 ("swiotlb: rework "fix info leak with DMA_FROM_DEVICE""), and effectively only revert the part that caused problems. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220328013731.017ae3e3.pasic@linux.ibm.com/ [1] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220324055732.GB12078@lst.de/ [2] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/4386660.LvFx2qVVIh@natalenko.name/ [3] Suggested-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com> Tested-by: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> --- Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst | 8 -------- include/linux/dma-mapping.h | 8 -------- kernel/dma/swiotlb.c | 12 ++++++++---- 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) --- a/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst +++ b/Documentation/core-api/dma-attributes.rst @@ -130,11 +130,3 @@ accesses to DMA buffers in both privileg subsystem that the buffer is fully accessible at the elevated privilege level (and ideally inaccessible or at least read-only at the lesser-privileged levels). - -DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE ------------------- - -This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected to -overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any of the -previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows bounce-buffering -implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers. --- a/include/linux/dma-mapping.h +++ b/include/linux/dma-mapping.h @@ -62,14 +62,6 @@ #define DMA_ATTR_PRIVILEGED (1UL << 9) /* - * This is a hint to the DMA-mapping subsystem that the device is expected - * to overwrite the entire mapped size, thus the caller does not require any - * of the previous buffer contents to be preserved. This allows - * bounce-buffering implementations to optimise DMA_FROM_DEVICE transfers. - */ -#define DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE (1UL << 10) - -/* * A dma_addr_t can hold any valid DMA or bus address for the platform. It can * be given to a device to use as a DMA source or target. It is specific to a * given device and there may be a translation between the CPU physical address --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c @@ -578,10 +578,14 @@ phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struc for (i = 0; i < nr_slots(alloc_size + offset); i++) mem->slots[index + i].orig_addr = slot_addr(orig_addr, i); tlb_addr = slot_addr(mem->start, index) + offset; - if (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_SKIP_CPU_SYNC) && - (!(attrs & DMA_ATTR_OVERWRITE) || dir == DMA_TO_DEVICE || - dir == DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL)) - swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); + /* + * When dir == DMA_FROM_DEVICE we could omit the copy from the orig + * to the tlb buffer, if we knew for sure the device will + * overwirte the entire current content. But we don't. Thus + * unconditional bounce may prevent leaking swiotlb content (i.e. + * kernel memory) to user-space. + */ + swiotlb_bounce(dev, tlb_addr, mapping_size, DMA_TO_DEVICE); return tlb_addr; }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists