| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20220405070315.001744775@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2022 09:33:57 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 543/599] ubifs: Fix to add refcount once page is set private
From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
commit 3b67db8a6ca83e6ff90b756d3da0c966f61cd37b upstream.
MM defined the rule [1] very clearly that once page was set with PG_private
flag, we should increment the refcount in that page, also main flows like
pageout(), migrate_page() will assume there is one additional page
reference count if page_has_private() returns true. Otherwise, we may
get a BUG in page migration:
page:0000000080d05b9d refcount:-1 mapcount:0 mapping:000000005f4d82a8
index:0xe2 pfn:0x14c12
aops:ubifs_file_address_operations [ubifs] ino:8f1 dentry name:"f30e"
flags: 0x1fffff80002405(locked|uptodate|owner_priv_1|private|node=0|
zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff)
page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(page_count(page) != 0)
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at include/linux/page_ref.h:184!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP
CPU: 3 PID: 38 Comm: kcompactd0 Not tainted 5.15.0-rc5
RIP: 0010:migrate_page_move_mapping+0xac3/0xe70
Call Trace:
ubifs_migrate_page+0x22/0xc0 [ubifs]
move_to_new_page+0xb4/0x600
migrate_pages+0x1523/0x1cc0
compact_zone+0x8c5/0x14b0
kcompactd+0x2bc/0x560
kthread+0x18c/0x1e0
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
Before the time, we should make clean a concept, what does refcount means
in page gotten from grab_cache_page_write_begin(). There are 2 situations:
Situation 1: refcount is 3, page is created by __page_cache_alloc.
TYPE_A - the write process is using this page
TYPE_B - page is assigned to one certain mapping by calling
__add_to_page_cache_locked()
TYPE_C - page is added into pagevec list corresponding current cpu by
calling lru_cache_add()
Situation 2: refcount is 2, page is gotten from the mapping's tree
TYPE_B - page has been assigned to one certain mapping
TYPE_A - the write process is using this page (by calling
page_cache_get_speculative())
Filesystem releases one refcount by calling put_page() in xxx_write_end(),
the released refcount corresponds to TYPE_A (write task is using it). If
there are any processes using a page, page migration process will skip the
page by judging whether expected_page_refs() equals to page refcount.
The BUG is caused by following process:
PA(cpu 0) kcompactd(cpu 1)
compact_zone
ubifs_write_begin
page_a = grab_cache_page_write_begin
add_to_page_cache_lru
lru_cache_add
pagevec_add // put page into cpu 0's pagevec
(refcnf = 3, for page creation process)
ubifs_write_end
SetPagePrivate(page_a) // doesn't increase page count !
unlock_page(page_a)
put_page(page_a) // refcnt = 2
[...]
PB(cpu 0)
filemap_read
filemap_get_pages
add_to_page_cache_lru
lru_cache_add
__pagevec_lru_add // traverse all pages in cpu 0's pagevec
__pagevec_lru_add_fn
SetPageLRU(page_a)
isolate_migratepages
isolate_migratepages_block
get_page_unless_zero(page_a)
// refcnt = 3
list_add(page_a, from_list)
migrate_pages(from_list)
__unmap_and_move
move_to_new_page
ubifs_migrate_page(page_a)
migrate_page_move_mapping
expected_page_refs get 3
(migration[1] + mapping[1] + private[1])
release_pages
put_page_testzero(page_a) // refcnt = 3
page_ref_freeze // refcnt = 0
page_ref_dec_and_test(0 - 1 = -1)
page_ref_unfreeze
VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(-1 != 0, page)
UBIFS doesn't increase the page refcount after setting private flag, which
leads to page migration task believes the page is not used by any other
processes, so the page is migrated. This causes concurrent accessing on
page refcount between put_page() called by other process(eg. read process
calls lru_cache_add) and page_ref_unfreeze() called by migration task.
Actually zhangjun has tried to fix this problem [2] by recalculating page
refcnt in ubifs_migrate_page(). It's better to follow MM rules [1], because
just like Kirill suggested in [2], we need to check all users of
page_has_private() helper. Like f2fs does in [3], fix it by adding/deleting
refcount when setting/clearing private for a page. BTW, according to [4],
we set 'page->private' as 1 because ubifs just simply SetPagePrivate().
And, [5] provided a common helper to set/clear page private, ubifs can
use this helper following the example of iomap, afs, btrfs, etc.
Jump [6] to find a reproducer.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/2b19b3c4-2bc4-15fa-15cc-27a13e5c7af1@aol.com
[2] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-mtd/msg04018.html
[3] http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1903.0/03313.html
[4] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-f2fs-devel/20210422154705.GO3596236@casper.infradead.org
[5] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20200517214718.468-1-guoqing.jiang@cloud.ionos.com
[6] https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214961
Fixes: 1e51764a3c2ac0 ("UBIFS: add new flash file system")
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
fs/ubifs/file.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ubifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/ubifs/file.c
@@ -570,7 +570,7 @@ static int ubifs_write_end(struct file *
}
if (!PagePrivate(page)) {
- SetPagePrivate(page);
+ attach_page_private(page, (void *)1);
atomic_long_inc(&c->dirty_pg_cnt);
__set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page);
}
@@ -947,7 +947,7 @@ static int do_writepage(struct page *pag
release_existing_page_budget(c);
atomic_long_dec(&c->dirty_pg_cnt);
- ClearPagePrivate(page);
+ detach_page_private(page);
ClearPageChecked(page);
kunmap(page);
@@ -1303,7 +1303,7 @@ static void ubifs_invalidatepage(struct
release_existing_page_budget(c);
atomic_long_dec(&c->dirty_pg_cnt);
- ClearPagePrivate(page);
+ detach_page_private(page);
ClearPageChecked(page);
}
@@ -1470,8 +1470,8 @@ static int ubifs_migrate_page(struct add
return rc;
if (PagePrivate(page)) {
- ClearPagePrivate(page);
- SetPagePrivate(newpage);
+ detach_page_private(page);
+ attach_page_private(newpage, (void *)1);
}
if (mode != MIGRATE_SYNC_NO_COPY)
@@ -1495,7 +1495,7 @@ static int ubifs_releasepage(struct page
return 0;
ubifs_assert(c, PagePrivate(page));
ubifs_assert(c, 0);
- ClearPagePrivate(page);
+ detach_page_private(page);
ClearPageChecked(page);
return 1;
}
@@ -1566,7 +1566,7 @@ static vm_fault_t ubifs_vm_page_mkwrite(
else {
if (!PageChecked(page))
ubifs_convert_page_budget(c);
- SetPagePrivate(page);
+ attach_page_private(page, (void *)1);
atomic_long_inc(&c->dirty_pg_cnt);
__set_page_dirty_nobuffers(page);
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists