lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <164933597968.2466529.532531148275084481.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 07 Apr 2022 13:52:59 +0100
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     dave.stevenson@...pberrypi.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, detlev.casanova@...labora.com
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] regulator/rpi-panel-attiny: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment

On Fri, 25 Mar 2022 20:45:08 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> GPIO library does copy the of_node from the parent device of
> the GPIO chip, there is no need to repeat this in the individual
> drivers. Remove these assignment all at once.
> 
> For the details one may look into the of_gpio_dev_init() implementation.
> 
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator/rpi-panel-attiny: Get rid of duplicate of_node assignment
      commit: 4917e54997b0c5fbf39a3bd574802a16fa705096

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ