linux-kernel - Re: WARNING: at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:3156 mark_page_dirty_in

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87tub56lh8.fsf@redhat.com>
Date:   Thu, 07 Apr 2022 16:01:39 +0200
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>
Cc:     "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: WARNING: at arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:3156
 mark_page_dirty_in_slot

Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> writes:

> On Tue, Mar 29, 2022, Naresh Kamboju wrote:
>> While running kselftest kvm test cases on x86_64 devices the following
>> kernel warning was reported.
>
> ...
>
>> [   62.510388] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [   62.515064] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 915 at
>> arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/kvm_main.c:3156
>> mark_page_dirty_in_slot+0xba/0xd0
>> [   62.525968] Modules linked in: x86_pkg_temp_thermal fuse
>> [   62.531307] CPU: 1 PID: 915 Comm: hyperv_clock Not tainted 5.17.0 #1
>> [   62.537691] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-5019S-ML/X11SSH-F, BIOS
>> 2.0b 07/27/2017
>> [   62.545185] RIP: 0010:mark_page_dirty_in_slot+0xba/0xd0
>
> Long known issue.  I think we're all waiting for someone else to post an actual
> patch.
>
> Vitaly, can you formally post the below patch, or do you need feedback first?
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/874k51eddp.fsf@redhat.com/
>

Sorry, missed this. Will do.

-- 
Vitaly