[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b43720c6-0763-f4bb-64a0-7745c6ad920a@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 09:36:08 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org
Cc: sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, jgross@...e.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
joro@...tes.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, knsathya@...nel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, sdeep@...are.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, brijesh.singh@....com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv8 00/30] TDX Guest: TDX core support
On 4/5/22 16:29, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
...
> arch/x86/coco/Makefile | 2 +
> arch/x86/coco/core.c | 22 +-
> arch/x86/coco/tdx/Makefile | 3 +
> arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdcall.S | 204 +++++++
> arch/x86/coco/tdx/tdx.c | 692 +++++++++++++++++++++++
This coco/ code currently doesn't have a specific MAINTAINERS entry.
That makes me a bit worried that folks like Kirill won't get cc'd on
patches.
Should we just do a MAINTAINERS entry like this? It would also be
really nice to get some SEV folks on the list as well. I suspect the
coco/ directory will grow more common SEV/TDX code over time.
X86 CONFIDENTIAL COMPUTING
M: x86@...nel.org
R: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
...
S: Supported
F: arch/x86/coco/
...
Powered by blists - more mailing lists