[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c934c457-fe8f-7937-f348-eccf46375878@suse.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 00:59:34 +0800
From: Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>
To: QintaoShen <unSimple1993@....com>
Cc: linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, kent.overstreet@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] bcache: Check for NULL return of kzalloc()
On 3/24/22 5:27 PM, QintaoShen wrote:
> kzalloc() is a memory allocation function which may return a NULL pointer.
> Therefore, it is better to check the return value of kzalloc() to avoid potential
> NULL-pointer dereference.
>
> Signed-off-by: QintaoShen <unSimple1993@....com>
> ---
> drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> index fdd0194..232ffe3 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> @@ -1105,6 +1105,9 @@ static void detached_dev_do_request(struct bcache_device *d, struct bio *bio,
> * which would call closure_get(&dc->disk.cl)
> */
> ddip = kzalloc(sizeof(struct detached_dev_io_private), GFP_NOIO);
> + if (!ddpp)
> + return ;
This is wrong. If you test your patch, you may experience a system hang
I guess.
Coly Li
> +
> ddip->d = d;
> /* Count on the bcache device */
> ddip->orig_bdev = orig_bdev;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists