[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xm26tub4vcg9.fsf@bsegall-linux.svl.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Apr 2022 13:57:26 -0700
From: Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
To: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, duanxiongchun@...edance.com,
songmuchun@...edance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] sched/fair: Fix cfs_rq_clock_pelt() for throttled
cfs_rq
Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com> writes:
> Since commit 23127296889f ("sched/fair: Update scale invariance of PELT")
> change to use rq_clock_pelt() instead of rq_clock_task(), we should also
> use rq_clock_pelt() for throttled_clock_task_time and throttled_clock_task
> accounting.
I think this patch is indeed what we want, despite the confusing
interactions between pelt slowdown+skipping and throttle_clock_task
trying to freeze time.
I think it would be slightly better to rename
throttled_clock_task(_time) to be clock_pelt rather than clock_task, but
that's minor.
Reviewed-by: Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>
>
> Fixes: 23127296889f ("sched/fair: Update scale invariance of PELT")
> Signed-off-by: Chengming Zhou <zhouchengming@...edance.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/fair.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index d4bd299d67ab..e6fa5d1141b4 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -4846,7 +4846,7 @@ static int tg_unthrottle_up(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
>
> cfs_rq->throttle_count--;
> if (!cfs_rq->throttle_count) {
> - cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task_time += rq_clock_task(rq) -
> + cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task_time += rq_clock_pelt(rq) -
> cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task;
>
> /* Add cfs_rq with load or one or more already running entities to the list */
> @@ -4864,7 +4864,7 @@ static int tg_throttle_down(struct task_group *tg, void *data)
>
> /* group is entering throttled state, stop time */
> if (!cfs_rq->throttle_count) {
> - cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task = rq_clock_task(rq);
> + cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task = rq_clock_pelt(rq);
> list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
> }
> cfs_rq->throttle_count++;
> @@ -5308,7 +5308,7 @@ static void sync_throttle(struct task_group *tg, int cpu)
> pcfs_rq = tg->parent->cfs_rq[cpu];
>
> cfs_rq->throttle_count = pcfs_rq->throttle_count;
> - cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task = rq_clock_task(cpu_rq(cpu));
> + cfs_rq->throttled_clock_task = rq_clock_pelt(cpu_rq(cpu));
> }
>
> /* conditionally throttle active cfs_rq's from put_prev_entity() */
Powered by blists - more mailing lists