[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a0ZYbNKyN7gjoQE4pu_ePE+0Y=tSwvdOHo6GraVokEJmw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 09:31:06 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@...il.com>,
Hubert Feurstein <hubert.feurstein@...tec.at>,
Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Imre Kaloz <kaloz@...nwrt.org>,
Krzysztof Halasa <khalasa@...p.pl>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Simtec Linux Team <linux@...tec.co.uk>,
Liviu Dudau <liviu.dudau@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>, patches@...nsource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/12] ARM: ARMv5 multiplatform conversions
On Thu, Apr 7, 2022 at 9:07 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 05/04/2022 11:17, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> >
> > I revisited some patches from a few years back, to see what
> > is needed forsome of the remaining platforms to become part of
> > CONFIG_ARCH_MULTIPLATFORM.
> >
> > A few things happened since I last looked at this, which helps to make
> > this easier:
> >
> > - The ixp4xx platform saw a large scale cleanup
> >
> > - The ep93xx platform lost support for MaverickCrunch FPUs and
> > gained support for the common clock subsystem
> >
> > - The OMAP1 platform has a proposed patch for the common
> > clock subsystem.
> >
> > - The generic IRQ entry code is now used everywhere, including
> > on IOP32x.
> >
> > - The s3c24xx platform is scheduled for removal next year
>
> Discussion [1] actually did not end with conclusion, but through all the
> time there were no other votes for the platform to stay.
Ok, thanks for the clarification, I misremembered the outcome
of the discussion. I've updated the reference in the mach/io.h
to no longer refer to that, but I still think it's safe to break
readw/writew on BAST ISA devices.
If we finish the multiplatform conversion for all ARMv5, I care
less about dropping s3c24xx entirely as an intermediate step,
but I definitely still like to see any board files and SoCs dropped
that have no users and are just a maintenance burden.
> I will resend my above [1] patch to mention the coming removal.
Ok, thanks!
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists