linux-kernel - [PATCH V4 2/4] riscv: patch_text: Fixup last cpu should be master

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu,  7 Apr 2022 15:33:21 +0800
From:   guoren@...nel.org
To:     guoren@...nel.org, arnd@...db.de, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:     linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V4 2/4] riscv: patch_text: Fixup last cpu should be master

From: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>

These patch_text implementations are using stop_machine_cpuslocked
infrastructure with atomic cpu_count. The original idea: When the
master CPU patch_text, the others should wait for it. But current
implementation is using the first CPU as master, which couldn't
guarantee the remaining CPUs are waiting. This patch changes the
last CPU as the master to solve the potential risk.

Fixes: 043cb41a85de ("riscv: introduce interfaces to patch kernel code")
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>
---
 arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
index 0b552873a577..765004b60513 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/patch.c
@@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static int patch_text_cb(void *data)
 	struct patch_insn *patch = data;
 	int ret = 0;
 
-	if (atomic_inc_return(&patch->cpu_count) == 1) {
+	if (atomic_inc_return(&patch->cpu_count) == num_online_cpus()) {
 		ret =
 		    patch_text_nosync(patch->addr, &patch->insn,
 					    GET_INSN_LENGTH(patch->insn));
-- 
2.25.1