linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] macintosh: fix via-pmu and via-cuda build errors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2187e41c-aecf-ff8c-9e53-d5f0c3f2283f@linux-m68k.org>
Date:   Thu, 7 Apr 2022 17:41:20 +1000 (AEST)
From:   Finn Thain <fthain@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] macintosh: fix via-pmu and via-cuda build errors

On Thu, 7 Apr 2022, Christophe Leroy wrote:

> Le 07/04/2022 à 05:16, Randy Dunlap a écrit :
> > 
> > 
> > On 4/6/22 19:37, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> When CONFIG_INPUT=m, the input_*() family of functions is not
> >> available to builtin drivers.
> >>
> >> When CONFIG_RTC_CLASS is not set, rtc_tm_to_time64() is not defined.
> >>
> >> Fix multiple build errors by making these Kconfig symbols required by
> >> ADB_CUDA (RTC_CLASS) and ADB_PMU (RTC_CLASS and INPUT).
> > 
> > Ah yes, Finn has already fixed the INPUT problems here.
> 
> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linuxppc-dev/patch/d987663bbed18d7dbf106db6066a759040b4e57a.1647837028.git.fthain@linux-m68k.org/
> 
> > 
> > Maybe that patch hasn't been merged anywhere yet?
> 
> The patch has comments, I guess we are waiting for a new version ?
> 

I'll send a new version, though I expect it will attract comments too.