[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d7b928b9-7be1-f129-ff03-6ec9fe083f34@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 10:14:40 +0200
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] /dev/[k]mem: make reads and writes interruptible
On 07.04.22 02:13, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> In 8619e5bdeee8 ("/dev/mem: Bail out upon SIGKILL."), /dev/[k]mem became
> killable, and that commit noted:
>
> Theoretically, reading/writing /dev/mem and /dev/kmem can become
> "interruptible". But this patch chose "killable". Future patch will
> make them "interruptible" so that we can revert to "killable" if
> some program regressed.
>
> So now we take the next step in making it "interruptible", by changing
> fatal_signal_pending() into signal_pending().
/dev/kmem is no more. So this should only apply to /dev/mem nowadays.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists