lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87v8vl8dpf.fsf@brahms.olymp>
Date:   Thu, 07 Apr 2022 10:06:36 +0100
From:   Luís Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
To:     Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com>
Cc:     Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ceph: invalidate pages when doing DIO in encrypted
 inodes

Xiubo Li <xiubli@...hat.com> writes:

> Hi Luis,
>
> Please try the following patch, to see could it resolve your issue:

No, this seems to deadlock when running my test.  I'm attaching the code
I'm using to test it; it's part of generic/647 but I've removed all the
other test cases that were passing.  I simply mount the filesystem with
test_dummy_encryption and run this test.  With your patch it'll hang;
without it it'll show "pwrite (O_DIRECT) is broken".  The extra
invalidate_inode_pages2_range() will make it pass.

Cheers,
-- 
Luís


View attachment "647.c" of type "text/x-csrc" (2309 bytes)


>
>
> diff --git a/fs/ceph/file.c b/fs/ceph/file.c
> index 5d39d8e54273..3507e4066de4 100644
> --- a/fs/ceph/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ceph/file.c
> @@ -2011,6 +2011,7 @@ static ssize_t ceph_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct
> iov_iter *to)
>                      ceph_cap_string(got));
>
>                 if (ci->i_inline_version == CEPH_INLINE_NONE) {
> + filemap_invalidate_lock(inode->i_mapping);
>                         if (!retry_op &&
>                             (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) &&
>                             !IS_ENCRYPTED(inode)) {
> @@ -2021,6 +2022,7 @@ static ssize_t ceph_read_iter(struct kiocb *iocb, struct
> iov_iter *to)
>                         } else {
>                                 ret = ceph_sync_read(iocb, to, &retry_op);
>                         }
> + filemap_invalidate_unlock(inode->i_mapping);
>                 } else {
>                         retry_op = READ_INLINE;
>                 }
> @@ -2239,11 +2241,13 @@ static ssize_t ceph_write_iter(struct kiocb *iocb,
> struct iov_iter *from)
>
>                 /* we might need to revert back to that point */
>                 data = *from;
> +               filemap_invalidate_lock(inode->i_mapping);
>                 if ((iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT) && !IS_ENCRYPTED(inode))
>                         written = ceph_direct_read_write(iocb, &data, snapc,
> &prealloc_cf);
>                 else
>                         written = ceph_sync_write(iocb, &data, pos, snapc);
> +               filemap_invalidate_unlock(inode->i_mapping);
>                 if (direct_lock)
>                         ceph_end_io_direct(inode);
>                 else
>
>
>
> On 4/1/22 9:32 PM, Luís Henriques wrote:
>> When doing DIO on an encrypted node, we need to invalidate the page cache in
>> the range being written to, otherwise the cache will include invalid data.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luís Henriques <lhenriques@...e.de>
>> ---
>>   fs/ceph/file.c | 11 ++++++++++-
>>   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> - Replaced truncate_inode_pages_range() by invalidate_inode_pages2_range
>> - Call fscache_invalidate with FSCACHE_INVAL_DIO_WRITE if we're doing DIO
>>
>> Note: I'm not really sure this last change is required, it doesn't really
>> affect generic/647 result, but seems to be the most correct.
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/ceph/file.c b/fs/ceph/file.c
>> index 5072570c2203..b2743c342305 100644
>> --- a/fs/ceph/file.c
>> +++ b/fs/ceph/file.c
>> @@ -1605,7 +1605,7 @@ ceph_sync_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from, loff_t pos,
>>   	if (ret < 0)
>>   		return ret;
>>   -	ceph_fscache_invalidate(inode, false);
>> +	ceph_fscache_invalidate(inode, (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT));
>>   	ret = invalidate_inode_pages2_range(inode->i_mapping,
>>   					    pos >> PAGE_SHIFT,
>>   					    (pos + count - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>> @@ -1895,6 +1895,15 @@ ceph_sync_write(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *from, loff_t pos,
>>   		req->r_inode = inode;
>>   		req->r_mtime = mtime;
>>   +		if (IS_ENCRYPTED(inode) && (iocb->ki_flags & IOCB_DIRECT)) {
>> +			ret = invalidate_inode_pages2_range(
>> +				inode->i_mapping,
>> +				write_pos >> PAGE_SHIFT,
>> +				(write_pos + write_len - 1) >> PAGE_SHIFT);
>> +			if (ret < 0)
>> +				dout("invalidate_inode_pages2_range returned %d\n", ret);
>> +		}
>> +
>>   		/* Set up the assertion */
>>   		if (rmw) {
>>   			/*
>>
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ