linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/597] 5.10.110-rc2 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220407094347.GA3044306@roeck-us.net>
Date:   Thu, 7 Apr 2022 02:43:47 -0700
From:   Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        slade@...dewatkins.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/597] 5.10.110-rc2 review

On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 02:37:01AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2022 at 03:43:51PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.110 release.
> > There are 597 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> > 
> > Responses should be made by Fri, 08 Apr 2022 13:27:53 +0000.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > 
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 161 pass: 150 fail: 11
> Failed builds:
> 	alpha:defconfig
> 	alpha:allmodconfig
> 	csky:defconfig
> 	m68k:defconfig
> 	m68k:allmodconfig
> 	m68k:sun3_defconfig
> 	m68k_nommu:m5475evb_defconfig
> 	microblaze:mmu_defconfig
> 	nds32:defconfig
> 	nds32:allmodconfig
> 	um:defconfig
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 477 pass: 448 fail: 29
> Failed tests:
> 	alpha:defconfig:initrd
> 	alpha:defconfig:devtmpfs:ide:net,e1000:rootfs
> 	alpha:defconfig:devtmpfs:sdhci:mmc:net,ne2k_pci:rootfs
> 	alpha:defconfig:devtmpfs:usb-ohci:net,pcnet:rootfs
> 	alpha:defconfig:devtmpfs:usb-ehci:net,virtio-net:rootfs
> 	alpha:defconfig:devtmpfs:pci-bridge:usb-xhci:net,pcnet:rootfs
> 	alpha:defconfig:devtmpfs:usb-uas-ehci:net,e1000:rootfs
> 	alpha:defconfig:devtmpfs:usb-uas-xhci:net,e1000:rootfs
> 	alpha:defconfig:devtmpfs:pci-bridge:scsi[AM53C974]:net,tulip:rootfs
> 	alpha:defconfig:devtmpfs:scsi[DC395]:net,e1000-82545em:rootfs
> 	alpha:defconfig:devtmpfs:scsi[MEGASAS]:net,rtl8139:rootfs
> 	alpha:defconfig:devtmpfs:scsi[MEGASAS2]:net,e1000-82544gc:rootfs
> 	alpha:defconfig:devtmpfs:scsi[FUSION]:net,usb-ohci:rootfs
> 	alpha:defconfig:devtmpfs:nvme:net,e1000:rootfs
> 	q800:m68040:mac_defconfig:initrd
> 	q800:m68040:mac_defconfig:rootfs
> 	microblaze:petalogix-s3adsp1800:initrd
> 	microblaze:petalogix-s3adsp1800:rootfs
> 	microblaze:petalogix-ml605:initrd
> 	microblaze:petalogix-ml605:rootfs
> 	microblazeel:petalogix-s3adsp1800:initrd
> 	microblazeel:petalogix-s3adsp1800:rootfs
> 	microblazeel:petalogix-ml605:initrd
> 	microblazeel:petalogix-ml605:rootfs
> 	s390:defconfig:nolocktests:smp2:net,default:initrd
> 	s390:defconfig:nolocktests:smp2:virtio-blk-ccw:net,virtio-net-pci:rootfs
> 	s390:defconfig:nolocktests:smp2:scsi[virtio-ccw]:net,default:rootfs
> 	s390:defconfig:nolocktests:virtio-pci:net,virtio-net-pci:rootfs
> 	s390:defconfig:nolocktests:scsi[virtio-pci]:net,default:rootfs
> 
> Errors:
> 
> fs/binfmt_elf.c: In function 'fill_note_info':
> fs/binfmt_elf.c:2050:45: error: 'siginfo' undeclared
> fs/binfmt_elf.c:2056:53: error: 'regs' undeclared
> 
> Plus there are the same s390 crashes as with -rc1.
> 
> No idea what I am missing here, but the failures are exactly the same as for -rc1.
> 

Sorry, something went wrong. Please disregard. I still see failures,
but different ones. I'll resend my report after repeating the test.

Guenter