linux-kernel - Re: arm64 spectre-bhb backports break boot on stable kernels <= v5.4

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d3d1c89e-82d7-6894-5bc0-3a0bbf367b8f@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 8 Apr 2022 17:38:13 +0100
From:   James Morse <james.morse@....com>
To:     Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, maz@...nel.org,
        catalin.marinas@....com, mark.rutland@....com
Subject: Re: arm64 spectre-bhb backports break boot on stable kernels <= v5.4

Hi Will,

On 08/04/2022 17:21, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 05:08:00PM +0100, James Morse wrote:
>> On 08/04/2022 13:00, Will Deacon wrote:
>>> Booting stable kernels <= v5.4 on arm64 with CONFIG_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR=n
>>> results in a NULL pointer dereference during boot due to kvm_get_hyp_vector()
>>> dereferencing a NULL pointer from arm64_get_bp_hardening_data():
>>>
>>> [    2.384444] Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
>>> [    2.384461] pstate: 20400085 (nzCv daIf +PAN -UAO)
>>> [    2.384472] pc : cpu_hyp_reinit+0x114/0x30c
>>> [    2.384476] lr : cpu_hyp_reinit+0x80/0x30c

>>> [    2.385171] Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
>>
>> Yikes!
>>
>> Interesting to know that stuff behind CONFIG_EXPERT has someone who cares about it.
>> (I was going to propose dropping the Kconfig option after a while).

> Yup! FWIW, the hardening options are enabled in Android (GKI), but this was
> reported to us externally by somebody using a custom config.

>>> I can bodge this as below (untested), but it's pretty grotty.
>>
>> I wanted to keep the detection code even if the feature is disabled so the sysfs reporting
>> is always correct.
> 
> Makes sense. Another option is to check for ARM64_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR in
> spectre_bhb_enable_mitigation(), but then I think the KVM code would need
> to query the mitigation state rather than just the cap.

It already does, but as you say KVM is only using the cap here.


>>> Please can you take a look?
>>
>> Ugh, arm64_get_bp_hardening_data() returns NULL with that Kconfig setup.
>>
>>
>> For v5.4, this fixes it for me:
>> --------------------%<--------------------
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
>> index 78d110667c0c..ffe0aad96b17 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_mmu.h
>> @@ -479,7 +479,8 @@ static inline void *kvm_get_hyp_vector(void)
>>         int slot = -1;
>>
>>         if ((cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR) ||
>> -            cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_SPECTRE_BHB)) && data->template_start) {
>> +            cpus_have_const_cap(ARM64_SPECTRE_BHB)) &&
>> +           data && data->template_start) {
>>                 vect = kern_hyp_va(kvm_ksym_ref(__bp_harden_hyp_vecs_start));
>>                 slot = data->hyp_vectors_slot;
>>         }
> 
> That'll work, but will sysfs report that BHB is mitigated even if
> !ARM64_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR?

The (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HARDEN_BRANCH_PREDICTOR) in check_branch_predictor() will set
__hardenbp_enab to false, which get_spectre_v2_workaround_state() picks up and causes
spectre_bhb_enable_mitigation() to skip all the mitigations, leaving state =
SPECTRE_VULNERABLE.

(The interactions with the other Spectre mitigations across the stable kernels
were/continue-to-be a pain in the neck)


>> --------------------%<--------------------
>>
>> I'll check the other versions and post patches to the stable list. Earlier stable
>> backports grew a dependency between these features as it wasn't possible to unpick the
>> dependencies.
> 
> Cheers. I know 4.19 is busted too, but I didn't check 4.14.

Yup, I've just reproduced that one. I suspect v4.14 is where I added the Kconfig dependency.


Thanks,

James