lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 8 Apr 2022 10:57:17 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan 
        <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Varad Gautam <varad.gautam@...e.com>,
        Dario Faggioli <dfaggioli@...e.com>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 4/8] x86/boot/compressed: Handle unaccepted memory

On 4/5/22 16:43, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Firmware is responsible for accepting memory where compressed kernel
> image and initrd land. But kernel has to accept memory for decompression
> buffer: accept memory just before decompression starts.

I think I'd appreciate a sentence or two more about what's going on.
How about something like this?

The firmware starts the kernel by booting into the "compressed" kernel
stub.  That stub's job is to decompress the full kernel image and then
jump to it.

The firmware will pre-accept the memory used to run the stub.  But, the
stub is responsible for accepting the memory into which it decompresses
the main kernel.  Accept memory just before decompression starts.

The stub is also responsible for choosing a physical address in which to
place the decompressed kernel image.  The KASLR mechanism will randomize
this physical address.  Since the unaccepted memory region is relatively
small, KASLR would be quite ineffective if it only used the pre-accepted
area (EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY).  Ensure that KASLR randomizes among the
entire physical address space by also including EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY.


> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/bitmap.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/bitmap.c
> index bf58b259380a..ba2de61c0823 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/bitmap.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/bitmap.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,48 @@
>  /* Taken from lib/string.c */
>  
>  #include <linux/bitmap.h>
> +#include <linux/math.h>
> +#include <linux/minmax.h>
> +
> +unsigned long _find_next_bit(const unsigned long *addr1,
> +		const unsigned long *addr2, unsigned long nbits,
> +		unsigned long start, unsigned long invert, unsigned long le)
> +{
> +	unsigned long tmp, mask;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(start >= nbits))
> +		return nbits;
> +
> +	tmp = addr1[start / BITS_PER_LONG];
> +	if (addr2)
> +		tmp &= addr2[start / BITS_PER_LONG];
> +	tmp ^= invert;
> +
> +	/* Handle 1st word. */
> +	mask = BITMAP_FIRST_WORD_MASK(start);
> +	if (le)
> +		mask = swab(mask);
> +
> +	tmp &= mask;
> +
> +	start = round_down(start, BITS_PER_LONG);
> +
> +	while (!tmp) {
> +		start += BITS_PER_LONG;
> +		if (start >= nbits)
> +			return nbits;
> +
> +		tmp = addr1[start / BITS_PER_LONG];
> +		if (addr2)
> +			tmp &= addr2[start / BITS_PER_LONG];
> +		tmp ^= invert;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (le)
> +		tmp = swab(tmp);
> +
> +	return min(start + __ffs(tmp), nbits);
> +}
>  
>  void __bitmap_set(unsigned long *map, unsigned int start, int len)
>  {
> @@ -22,3 +64,23 @@ void __bitmap_set(unsigned long *map, unsigned int start, int len)
>  		*p |= mask_to_set;
>  	}
>  }
> +
> +void __bitmap_clear(unsigned long *map, unsigned int start, int len)
> +{
> +	unsigned long *p = map + BIT_WORD(start);
> +	const unsigned int size = start + len;
> +	int bits_to_clear = BITS_PER_LONG - (start % BITS_PER_LONG);
> +	unsigned long mask_to_clear = BITMAP_FIRST_WORD_MASK(start);
> +
> +	while (len - bits_to_clear >= 0) {
> +		*p &= ~mask_to_clear;
> +		len -= bits_to_clear;
> +		bits_to_clear = BITS_PER_LONG;
> +		mask_to_clear = ~0UL;
> +		p++;
> +	}
> +	if (len) {
> +		mask_to_clear &= BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(size);
> +		*p &= ~mask_to_clear;
> +	}
> +}

It's a real shame that we have to duplicate this code.  Is there
anything crazy we could do here like

#include "../../../lib/find_bit.c"

?

> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> index 411b268bc0a2..59db90626042 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/kaslr.c
> @@ -725,10 +725,20 @@ process_efi_entries(unsigned long minimum, unsigned long image_size)
>  		 * but in practice there's firmware where using that memory leads
>  		 * to crashes.
>  		 *
> -		 * Only EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY is guaranteed to be free.
> +		 * Only EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY and EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY (if
> +		 * supported) are guaranteed to be free.
>  		 */
> -		if (md->type != EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY)
> +
> +		switch (md->type) {
> +		case EFI_CONVENTIONAL_MEMORY:
> +			break;
> +		case EFI_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY:
> +			if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY))
> +				break;
>  			continue;
> +		default:
> +			continue;
> +		}
>  
>  		if (efi_soft_reserve_enabled() &&
>  		    (md->attribute & EFI_MEMORY_SP))
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c
> index fa8969fad011..c1d9d71a6615 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/misc.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
>  #include "../string.h"
>  #include "../voffset.h"
>  #include <asm/bootparam_utils.h>
> +#include <asm/unaccepted_memory.h>
>  
>  /*
>   * WARNING!!
> @@ -43,6 +44,9 @@
>  void *memmove(void *dest, const void *src, size_t n);
>  #endif
>  
> +#undef __pa
> +#define __pa(x)	((unsigned long)(x))

Those #undef's always worry me.  Why is this one needed?

>  /*
>   * This is set up by the setup-routine at boot-time
>   */
> @@ -451,6 +455,13 @@ asmlinkage __visible void *extract_kernel(void *rmode, memptr heap,
>  #endif
>  
>  	debug_putstr("\nDecompressing Linux... ");
> +
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY) &&
> +	    boot_params->unaccepted_memory) {
> +		debug_putstr("Accepting memory... ");
> +		accept_memory(__pa(output), __pa(output) + needed_size);
> +	}
> +
>  	__decompress(input_data, input_len, NULL, NULL, output, output_len,
>  			NULL, error);
>  	parse_elf(output);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/unaccepted_memory.c b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/unaccepted_memory.c
> index d363acf59c08..3ebab63789bb 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/boot/compressed/unaccepted_memory.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/boot/compressed/unaccepted_memory.c
> @@ -51,3 +51,17 @@ void mark_unaccepted(struct boot_params *params, u64 start, u64 end)
>  	bitmap_set((unsigned long *)params->unaccepted_memory,
>  		   start / PMD_SIZE, (end - start) / PMD_SIZE);
>  }
> +
> +void accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end)
> +{
> +	unsigned long *unaccepted_memory;
> +	unsigned int rs, re;
> +
> +	unaccepted_memory = (unsigned long *)boot_params->unaccepted_memory;
> +	rs = start / PMD_SIZE;

OK, so start is a physical address, PMD_SIZE is 2^21, and 'rs' is an
unsigned int.  That means 'rs' can, at most, represent a physical
address at 2^(21+32), or 2^53.  That's cutting it a *bit* close, don't
you think?

Could we please just give 'rs' and 're' real names and make them
'unsigned long's, please?  It will surely save at least one other person
from doing math.  The find_next_bit() functions seem to take ulongs anyway.

> +	for_each_set_bitrange_from(rs, re, unaccepted_memory,
> +				   DIV_ROUND_UP(end, PMD_SIZE)) {
> +		__accept_memory(rs * PMD_SIZE, re * PMD_SIZE);
> +		bitmap_clear(unaccepted_memory, rs, re - rs);
> +	}
> +}

Could we please introduce some intermediate variable?  For instance:

	unsigned long bitmap_size = DIV_ROUND_UP(end, PMD_SIZE);

That will make this all a lot easier to read.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/unaccepted_memory.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/unaccepted_memory.h
> index cbc24040b853..f1f835d3cd78 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/unaccepted_memory.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/unaccepted_memory.h
> @@ -9,4 +9,6 @@ struct boot_params;
>  
>  void mark_unaccepted(struct boot_params *params, u64 start, u64 num);
>  
> +void accept_memory(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t end);
> +
>  #endif

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ