[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7cji=xSAy673sXGf2GXFsKKsR7=pNKJceLtHX1sFFUZcKg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 11:13:09 -0700
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
linux-perf-users <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
leo.yan@...aro.com, German Gomez <German.Gomez@....com>,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: arm-spe: Fix perf report --mem-mode
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 8, 2022 at 7:41 AM James Clark <james.clark@....com> wrote:
>
> Since commit bb30acae4c4d ("perf report: Bail out --mem-mode if mem info
> is not available") "perf mem report" and "perf report --mem-mode" don't
> allow opening the file unless one of the events has PERF_SAMPLE_DATA_SRC
> set.
>
> SPE doesn't have this set even though synthetic memory data is generated
> after it is decoded. Fix this issue by setting DATA_SRC on SPE events.
> This has no effect on the data collected because the SPE driver doesn't
> do anything with that flag and doesn't generate samples.
>
> Fixes: bb30acae4c4d ("perf report: Bail out --mem-mode if mem info is not available")
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Thanks,
Namhyung
> ---
> tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c
> index 86e2e926aa0e..a1419e6341c0 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/arm-spe.c
> @@ -239,6 +239,12 @@ static int arm_spe_recording_options(struct auxtrace_record *itr,
> arm_spe_set_timestamp(itr, arm_spe_evsel);
> }
>
> + /*
> + * Set this only so that perf report knows that SPE generates memory info. It has no effect
> + * on the opening of the event or the SPE data produced.
> + */
> + evsel__set_sample_bit(arm_spe_evsel, DATA_SRC);
> +
> /* Add dummy event to keep tracking */
> err = parse_events(evlist, "dummy:u", NULL);
> if (err)
> @@ -523,6 +529,5 @@ struct perf_event_attr
>
> arm_spe_pmu->selectable = true;
> arm_spe_pmu->is_uncore = false;
> -
> return attr;
> }
> --
> 2.28.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists