[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220407201250.b4ebaae0cb327cad7b2eb3cf@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 20:12:50 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rafael Aquini <aquini@...hat.com>,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
Christoph von Recklinghausen <crecklin@...hat.com>,
Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
"Herton R . Krzesinski" <herton@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Joel Savitz <jsavitz@...hat.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7] oom_kill.c: futex: Don't OOM reap the VMA containing
the robust_list_head
On Thu, 7 Apr 2022 23:01:37 -0400 Nico Pache <npache@...hat.com> wrote:
> The pthread struct is allocated on PRIVATE|ANONYMOUS memory [1] which can
> be targeted by the oom reaper. This mapping is used to store the futex
> robust list head; the kernel does not keep a copy of the robust list and
> instead references a userspace address to maintain the robustness during
> a process death. A race can occur between exit_mm and the oom reaper that
> allows the oom reaper to free the memory of the futex robust list before
> the exit path has handled the futex death:
>
> CPU1 CPU2
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> page_fault
> do_exit "signal"
> wake_oom_reaper
> oom_reaper
> oom_reap_task_mm (invalidates mm)
> exit_mm
> exit_mm_release
> futex_exit_release
> futex_cleanup
> exit_robust_list
> get_user (EFAULT- can't access memory)
>
> If the get_user EFAULT's, the kernel will be unable to recover the
> waiters on the robust_list, leaving userspace mutexes hung indefinitely.
>
> Use the robust_list address stored in the kernel to skip the VMA that holds
> it, allowing a successful futex_cleanup.
>
> Theoretically a failure can still occur if there are locks mapped as
> PRIVATE|ANON; however, the robust futexes are a best-effort approach.
> This patch only strengthens that best-effort.
>
> The following case can still fail:
> robust head (skipped) -> private lock (reaped) -> shared lock (skipped)
>
> Reproducer: https://gitlab.com/jsavitz/oom_futex_reproducer
>
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/glibc/latest/source/nptl/allocatestack.c#L370
>
> ...
>
> --- a/include/linux/oom.h
> +++ b/include/linux/oom.h
> @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static inline vm_fault_t check_stable_address_space(struct mm_struct *mm)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct mm_struct *mm);
> +bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, void *robust_list);
>
> long oom_badness(struct task_struct *p,
> unsigned long totalpages);
> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
> index 3aa839f81e63..d5af1b83cbb2 100644
> --- a/mm/mmap.c
> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
> @@ -3109,6 +3109,11 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
> struct mmu_gather tlb;
> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> unsigned long nr_accounted = 0;
> + void *robust_list;
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX
> + robust_list = current->robust_list;
> +#endif
>
> /* mm's last user has gone, and its about to be pulled down */
> mmu_notifier_release(mm);
> @@ -3126,7 +3131,8 @@ void exit_mmap(struct mm_struct *mm)
> * to mmu_notifier_release(mm) ensures mmu notifier callbacks in
> * __oom_reap_task_mm() will not block.
> */
> - (void)__oom_reap_task_mm(mm);
> + (void)__oom_reap_task_mm(mm, robust_list);
uninitialized var warning when CONFIG_FUTEX=n?
> +
> set_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags);
> }
>
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -509,9 +509,10 @@ static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(oom_reaper_wait);
> static struct task_struct *oom_reaper_list;
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(oom_reaper_lock);
>
> -bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
> +bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct mm_struct *mm, void *robust_list)
Well, this is no longer necessarily a robust_list*. It's just an
address to skip and the name should reflect that?
> {
> struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> + unsigned long skip_vma = (unsigned long) robust_list;
> bool ret = true;
>
> /*
> @@ -526,6 +527,20 @@ bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
> if (vma->vm_flags & (VM_HUGETLB|VM_PFNMAP))
> continue;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX
> + /*
> + * The OOM reaper runs concurrently with do_exit.
> + * The robust_list_head is stored in userspace and is required
> + * by the exit path to recover the robust futex waiters.
> + * Skip the VMA that contains the robust_list to allow for
> + * proper cleanup.
> + */
> + if (vma->vm_start <= skip_vma && vma->vm_end > skip_vma) {
> + pr_info("oom_reaper: skipping vma, contains robust_list");
> + continue;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> /*
> * Only anonymous pages have a good chance to be dropped
> * without additional steps which we cannot afford as we
> @@ -567,6 +582,7 @@ bool __oom_reap_task_mm(struct mm_struct *mm)
> static bool oom_reap_task_mm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
> {
> bool ret = true;
> + void *robust_list;
>
> if (!mmap_read_trylock(mm)) {
> trace_skip_task_reaping(tsk->pid);
> @@ -586,8 +602,11 @@ static bool oom_reap_task_mm(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm)
>
> trace_start_task_reaping(tsk->pid);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX
> + robust_list = tsk->robust_list;
> +#endif
> /* failed to reap part of the address space. Try again later */
> - ret = __oom_reap_task_mm(mm);
> + ret = __oom_reap_task_mm(mm, robust_list);
unintialized var when CONFIG_FUTEX=n?
> if (!ret)
> goto out_finish;
>
> @@ -1149,6 +1168,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(process_mrelease, int, pidfd, unsigned int, flags)
> unsigned int f_flags;
> bool reap = false;
> long ret = 0;
> + void *robust_list;
>
> if (flags)
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -1186,11 +1206,16 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(process_mrelease, int, pidfd, unsigned int, flags)
> ret = -EINTR;
> goto drop_mm;
> }
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_FUTEX
> + robust_list = p->robust_list;
> +#endif
> /*
> * Check MMF_OOM_SKIP again under mmap_read_lock protection to ensure
> * possible change in exit_mmap is seen
> */
> - if (!test_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags) && !__oom_reap_task_mm(mm))
> + if (!test_bit(MMF_OOM_SKIP, &mm->flags) &&
> + !__oom_reap_task_mm(mm, robust_list))
again
> ret = -EAGAIN;
> mmap_read_unlock(mm);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists