[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220408172714.52d64c84@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 17:27:14 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@...gle.com>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...roid.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Tim Murray <timmurray@...gle.com>, Wei Wang <wvw@...gle.com>,
Kyle Lin <kylelin@...gle.com>,
Chunwei Lu <chunweilu@...gle.com>,
Lulu Wang <luluw@...gle.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
rcu <rcu@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] EXP rcu: Move expedited grace period (GP) work to RT
kthread_worker
On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 08:58:34 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
> > I do not see why PREEMPT_RT is special here. Why was it singled out?
>
> Because I didn't see the point of doing kthread_create_worker() to create
> a pair of kthread_worker structuress that were never going to be used
> in PREEMPT_RT kernels.
>
> Or are PREEMPT_RT kernels no longer booting with rcupdate.rcu_normal?
> Last I knew, they all did this to avoid IPI latencies from expedited
> grace periods. Has this changed?
Honestly, I don't know. But I guess I can go and find out ;-)
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists