[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a48c74e447c233799a497702fe90cfa126eb952a.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 11:55:03 +0800
From: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Tim Chang <jia-wei.chang@...iatek.com>
CC: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <fan.chen@...iatek.com>,
<louis.yu@...iatek.com>, <roger.lu@...iatek.com>,
<Allen-yy.Lin@...iatek.com>,
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>,
<hsinyi@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: mediatek: introduce mtk cpufreq
On Tue, 2022-03-08 at 10:06 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 07-03-22, 20:21, Tim Chang wrote:
> > CPUFREQ is DVFS driver used for power saving by scaling clock
> > frequency
> > and supply voltage of CPUs. This module cooperates with CCI DEVFREQ
> > for
> > certain Mediatek SoCs.
>
> Both subject and this log talks as if you are adding a new cpufreq
> driver, while what you are doing is just cleanup mostly. This isn't
> how it should be done.
>
> You need to be very explicit with what you are doing and make that
> change in a separate patch. The cover letter should tell what you are
> doing and why.
>
Hello Viresh,
Thanks for your suggestion.
Indeed, the subject is not proper for this series.
I will help to upstream next version and fix the issue because of
resource issues.
Thanks.
BRs,
Rex
Powered by blists - more mailing lists