linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] Convert powerpc to default topdown mmap layout (v8)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87v8vk6wfr.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date:   Fri, 08 Apr 2022 14:17:12 +1000
From:   Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "alex@...ti.fr" <alex@...ti.fr>,
        Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 00/14] Convert powerpc to default topdown mmap layout
 (v8)

Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 15:26:42 +1100 Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
>
>> > What will be the merge strategy ? I guess it's a bit late to get it 
>> > through powerpc tree, so I was just wondering whether we could get 
>> > patches 2 to 5 in mm this cycle, and the powerpc ones next cycle ?
>> 
>> Yeah I didn't pick it up because the mm changes don't have many acks and
>> I'm always nervous about carrying generic mm changes.
>> 
>> It would be my preference if Andrew could take 2-5 through mm for v5.18,
>> but it is quite late, so I'm not sure how he will feel about that.
>
> 5.18 isn't a problem.  Perhaps you meant 5.17, which would be real tough.

Sorry, missed your reply.

> Can we take a look after 5.18-rc1?

Yes :)

cheers