[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220408053457.GA857847@ls.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2022 22:34:57 -0700
From: Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Sagi Shahar <sagis@...gle.com>,
"Yamahata, Isaku" <isaku.yamahata@...el.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, isaku.yamahata@...il.com,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Erdem Aktas <erdemaktas@...gle.com>,
Connor Kuehl <ckuehl@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 083/104] KVM: x86: Split core of hypercall
emulation to helper function
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 03:12:57PM +0200,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > + if (static_call(kvm_x86_get_cpl)(vcpu) != 0) {
> > > + ret = -KVM_EPERM;
> > > + goto out;
> > > + }
>
> Is this guaranteed by TDG.VP.VMCALL?
Yes. TDCALL instruction in TD results in #GP(0) if CPL > 0.
It's documented in trust domain CPU architectural extensions spec.
https://www.intel.com/content/dam/develop/external/us/en/documents-tps/intel-tdx-cpu-architectural-specification.pdf
Anyway VMM can't know TD guest CPL (or other CPU state).
--
Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists