[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220408080931.2494356-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 08:09:31 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: broonie@...nel.org
Cc: linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH] spi: spi-ti-qspi: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
for simplifing code
Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
---
drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c b/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c
index e06aafe169e0..e6e8b062766f 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-ti-qspi.c
@@ -172,9 +172,8 @@ static int ti_qspi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
dev_dbg(qspi->dev, "hz: %d, clock divider %d\n",
qspi->spi_max_frequency, clk_div);
- ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(qspi->dev);
+ ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(qspi->dev);
if (ret < 0) {
- pm_runtime_put_noidle(qspi->dev);
dev_err(qspi->dev, "pm_runtime_get_sync() failed\n");
return ret;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists