[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220408094718.383658532@infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 11:45:55 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, jpoimboe@...hat.com
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] x86,objtool: Mark cpu_startup_entry() __noreturn
GCC-8 isn't clever enough to figure out that cpu_start_entry() is a
noreturn while objtool is. This results in code after the call in
start_secondary(). Give GCC a hand so that they all agree on things.
vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: start_secondary()+0x10e: unreachable
Reported-by: Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
include/linux/cpu.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/include/linux/cpu.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpu.h
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static inline int suspend_disable_second
static inline void suspend_enable_secondary_cpus(void) { }
#endif /* !CONFIG_PM_SLEEP_SMP */
-void cpu_startup_entry(enum cpuhp_state state);
+void __noreturn cpu_startup_entry(enum cpuhp_state state);
void cpu_idle_poll_ctrl(bool enable);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists