[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YlAjfAab+Oh3HcCR@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 14:58:52 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gilles Buloz <gilles.buloz@...tron.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] tty: Add lookahead param to receive_buf
On Fri, Apr 08, 2022 at 02:39:53PM +0300, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> After lookahead for XON/XOFF characters is added by the next
> patch, the receive side needs to ensure the flow-control
> actions are not retaken later on when those same characters
> get read by TTY.
>
> Thus, pass lookahead count to receive_buf and skip
> flow-control character actions if already taken for the
> character in question. Lookahead count will become live after
> the next patch.
...
> + if (c == STOP_CHAR(tty)) {
> + if (!lookahead_done)
But now it can be as below
if (c == STOP_CHAR(tty) && !lookahead_done)
> + stop_tty(tty);
> + } else if ((c == START_CHAR(tty) && !lookahead_done) ||
> (tty->flow.stopped && !tty->flow.tco_stopped && I_IXANY(tty) &&
> c != INTR_CHAR(tty) && c != QUIT_CHAR(tty) &&
> c != SUSP_CHAR(tty))) {
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists