[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <24f79a7c-0146-ad0a-988a-608edd402faa@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 15:10:02 +0200
From: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>
To: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-trace-devel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] rtla: Minor fix to grammar in README.txt
On 4/2/22 06:39, John Kacur wrote:
> "The rtla" doesn't make sense, change it to "The rtla tool"
> This is better than removing the word "The" since some packaging tools
> need the description to start with a capital letter.
>
> Signed-off-by: John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>
> ---
> tools/tracing/rtla/README.txt | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/tracing/rtla/README.txt b/tools/tracing/rtla/README.txt
> index 6c88446f7e74..3b809eeff5f9 100644
> --- a/tools/tracing/rtla/README.txt
> +++ b/tools/tracing/rtla/README.txt
> @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
> RTLA: Real-Time Linux Analysis tools
>
> -The rtla is a meta-tool that includes a set of commands that
> +The rtla tool is a meta-tool that includes a set of commands that
I do not like bike-shedding but 'the rtla tool is a meta-tool" sounds repetitive.
Does:
The rtla meta-tool includes a set of commands...
sound good for you?
-- Daniel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists