[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2GaGJp5T0FARGpEE4FSEdCCQQNOecHtBBdQxqneeCWad2PD7gKqhp6-2LhdZSpTvDToW2kKggbfzlcvw9vsM7L_kJXo1uMNjoiAHJ4bQAjI=@emersion.fr>
Date: Fri, 08 Apr 2022 13:26:50 +0000
From: Simon Ser <contact@...rsion.fr>
To: Grigory Vasilyev <h0tc0d3@...il.com>
Cc: Bas Nieuwenhuizen <bas@...nieuwenhuizen.nl>,
Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@....com>,
Melissa Wen <mwen@...lia.com>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@....com>,
Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
"Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@....com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Michel Dänzer <mdaenzer@...hat.com>,
Evan Quan <evan.quan@....com>,
Sean Paul <seanpaul@...omium.org>,
Qingqing Zhuo <qingqing.zhuo@....com>,
amd-gfx mailing list <amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
ML dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Fix NULL pointer dereference
On Friday, April 8th, 2022 at 15:21, Grigory Vasilyev <h0tc0d3@...il.com> wrote:
> Simon Ser and Bas Nieuwenhuizen, do you understand that you are
> proposing to make the code less safe in the future? In the future,
> someone might rewrite the code and we'll get an error.
I don't think we should blindly add NULL checks for all functions which
take a pointer as argument. This makes it way more complicated to find
a bug when the function is mis-used. Crashing is better because it
indicates a programmer error. In the future, any new call with a NULL
pointer will produce a clear error.
Using pointers for output values is a common pattern in C, it allows a
function to return multiple values.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists