[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a2cf094-07f0-9497-c966-4667c51b8b0c@collabora.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2022 15:37:00 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>, rafael@...nel.org,
viresh.kumar@...aro.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org
Cc: matthias.bgg@...il.com, jia-wei.chang@...iatek.com,
roger.lu@...iatek.com, hsinyi@...gle.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 10/15] cpufreq: mediatek: Make sram regulator optional
Il 08/04/22 06:59, Rex-BC Chen ha scritto:
> From: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@...iatek.com>
>
> For some MediaTek SoCs, like MT8186, it's possible that the sram regulator
> is shared between CPU and CCI.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@...iatek.com>
Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists