lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <98d3b9b9-1786-837c-d316-cc991305c8aa@kernel.dk>
Date:   Fri, 8 Apr 2022 20:28:22 -0600
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     "yukuai (C)" <yukuai3@...wei.com>,
        andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, john.garry@...wei.com,
        ming.lei@...hat.com
Cc:     linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next RFC v2 0/8] improve tag allocation under heavy load

On 4/8/22 8:26 PM, yukuai (C) wrote:
> 在 2022/04/09 3:10, Jens Axboe 写道:
>> For this one, and other patches you send, they send up in spam because
>> the sender can't be verified. I would encourage you to figure out what
>> is going wrong here, because a lot of your patches end up getting
>> dropped or missed because of it.
>>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Thanks for your notice, however, I have no clue what is going on right
> now. I'll look for some help and hopefully that can be fixed.

The easiest is probably to try and send patches to a gmail account. If
you don't have one, just create one. That will help you see the issue
and verify whatever the fix might be. It might be a company email
server issue, hower.

-- 
Jens Axboe

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ