[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220409093500.10329-5-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 17:34:55 +0800
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: <ying.huang@...el.com>, <songmuchun@...edance.com>,
<hch@...radead.org>, <willy@...radead.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/9] mm/vmscan: save a bit of stack space in shrink_lruvec
LRU_UNEVICTABLE is not taken into account when shrink lruvec. So we can
save a bit of stack space by shrinking the array size of nr and targets
to NR_LRU_LISTS - 1. No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 59b96320f481..0e5818970998 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -2881,8 +2881,9 @@ static bool can_age_anon_pages(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
static void shrink_lruvec(struct lruvec *lruvec, struct scan_control *sc)
{
- unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS];
- unsigned long targets[NR_LRU_LISTS];
+ /* LRU_UNEVICTABLE is not taken into account. */
+ unsigned long nr[NR_LRU_LISTS - 1];
+ unsigned long targets[NR_LRU_LISTS - 1];
unsigned long nr_to_scan;
enum lru_list lru;
unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists