[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <B9FD64FE-82B0-4DC2-B4C3-BE266DAB28A0@goldelico.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 15:09:19 +0200
From: "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, letux-kernel@...nphoenux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/18] dt-bindings: fix jz4780-nemc issue as reported by
dtbscheck
> Am 09.04.2022 um 13:26 schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>:
>
> On 08/04/2022 20:37, H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
>> jz4780-nemc needs to be compatible to simple-mfd as well or we get
>>
>> arch/mips/boot/dts/ingenic/ci20.dtb: memory-controller@...10000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed:
>> ['ingenic,jz4780-nemc', 'simple-mfd'] is too long
>> 'ingenic,jz4725b-nemc' was expected
>> 'ingenic,jz4740-nemc' was expected
>> From schema: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,nemc.yaml
>>
>> Signed-off-by: H. Nikolaus Schaller <hns@...delico.com>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,nemc.yaml | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,nemc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,nemc.yaml
>> index 24f9e19820282..3b1116588de3d 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,nemc.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/memory-controllers/ingenic,nemc.yaml
>> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ properties:
>> oneOf:
>> - enum:
>> -
>> - - ingenic,jz4780-nemc
>> + - [ , simple-mfd ]
>
> This is not correct representation. If you really need simple-mfd, then
> this should be a separate item below oneOf.
Well, it is valid YAML syntax and seems to be accepted by dtbscheck.
> The true question is whether you need simple-mfd. Isn't the binding (and
> the driver) expected to instantiate its children?
I had expected that but current ingenic,jz4780-nemc code doesn't.
Everything is explained in 190607f2d59e174bcf8415efb1bb390737f8d428
But if someone writes a fix for the ingenic,jz4740-nemc driever
we can of course live without this patch. And partially revert
190607f2d59e174bcf8415efb1bb390737f8d428
Powered by blists - more mailing lists