[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <446a3e88-4c14-300d-862a-1279274c3760@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 15:20:29 +0200
From: Michal Orzel <michalorzel.eng@...il.com>
To: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"Richard Russon (FlatCap)" <ldm@...tcap.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-ntfs-dev@...ts.sourceforge.net, llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: Remove redundant assignments
Hi Tom,
>
> On 4/9/22 3:19 AM, Michal Orzel wrote:
>> Get rid of redundant assignments which end up in values not being
>> read either because they are overwritten or the function ends.
>
> This log is the same as your last patch.
>
> Instead of a general statement on deadstores, a more specific
>
> analysis of the setting being removed would be helpful.
>
> This will mean splitting the patch to match the analysis.
>
> Tom
>
I think that this explanation in a commit is enough for such a trivial patch.
It informs that we are fixing clang-tidy findings related to deadstores
in a block subsystem. What analysis would you want to see?
Something like "Remove deadstore assignment ret = -EINVAL in a function bio_map_user_iov" ?
I think that it will create too much of not needed overhead.
Cheers,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists