[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7d3a5a6b-9772-a52a-fd18-2e07a8832e91@linaro.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 17:10:05 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Duoming Zhou <duoming@....edu.cn>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, alexander.deucher@....com,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers: nfc: nfcmrvl: fix UAF bug in
nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev()
On 09/04/2022 15:58, Duoming Zhou wrote:
> There is a potential UAF bug in nfcmrvl usb driver between
> unregister and resume operation.
>
> The race that cause that UAF can be shown as below:
>
> (FREE) | (USE)
> | nfcmrvl_resume
> | nfcmrvl_submit_bulk_urb
> | nfcmrvl_bulk_complete
> | nfcmrvl_nci_recv_frame
> | nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_recv_frame
> | skb_queue_tail
> nfcmrvl_disconnect |
> nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev |
> nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_deinit | ...
> destroy_workqueue //(1) |
> ... | queue_work //(2)
>
> When nfcmrvl usb driver is resuming, we detach the device.
> The workqueue is destroyed in position (1), but it will be
> latter used in position (2), which leads to data race.
I miss here something. How can you queue work on a destroyed workqueue?
When workqueue is destroyed, no more work should be executed. Unless you
mean the case that draining the work (during destroying, not after)
causes the (2) to happen?
> This patch reorders the nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_deinit after
> nci_unregister_device in order to prevent UAF. Because
> nci_unregister_device will not return until finish all
> operations from upper layer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou <duoming@....edu.cn>
> ---
> drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c
> index 2fcf545012b..5ed17b23ee8 100644
> --- a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c
> @@ -186,12 +186,11 @@ void nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv)
> if (priv->ndev->nfc_dev->fw_download_in_progress)
> nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_abort(priv);
>
> - nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_deinit(priv);
> -
> if (gpio_is_valid(priv->config.reset_n_io))
> gpio_free(priv->config.reset_n_io);
>
> nci_unregister_device(ndev);
> + nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_deinit(priv);
The new order matches reverse-probe, so actually makes sense.
> nci_free_device(ndev);
> kfree(priv);
> }
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists