[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220409155612.GO4285@paulmck-ThinkPad-P17-Gen-1>
Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 08:56:12 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Cc: Kalesh Singh <kaleshsingh@...gle.com>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] EXP rcu: Move expedited grace period (GP) work to RT
kthread_worker
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 03:17:40PM +0800, Hillf Danton wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2022 10:53:53 -0700 Kalesh Singh wrote
> > Thanks for the discussion everyone.
> >
> > We didn't fully switch to kthread workers to avoid changing the
> > behavior for users that dont need this low latency exp GPs. Another
> > (and perhaps more important) reason is because kthread_worker offers
> > reduced concurrency than workqueues which Pual reported can pose
> > issues on systems with a large number of CPUs.
>
> A second ... what issues were reported wrt concurrency, given the output
> of grep -nr workqueue block mm drivers.
>
> Feel free to post a URL link to the issues.
The issues can be easily seen by inspecting kthread_queue_work() and
the functions that it invokes. In contrast, normal workqueues uses
per-CPU mechanisms to avoid contention, as can equally easily be seen
by inspecting queue_work_on() and the functions that it invokes.
Please do feel free to take a look.
If taking a look does not convince you, please construct some in-kernel
benchmarks to test the scalability of these two mechanisms. Please note
that some care will be required to make sure that you are doing a valid
apples-to-apples comparison.
Thanx, Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists