lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <164953575112.4207.4558393487753239676.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date:   Sat, 09 Apr 2022 20:22:31 -0000
From:   "tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: timers/core] timers: Simplify calc_index()

The following commit has been merged into the timers/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     a2026e44eff5d74a83d7ffee6325a007bef85385
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/a2026e44eff5d74a83d7ffee6325a007bef85385
Author:        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate:    Mon, 04 Apr 2022 16:47:55 +02:00
Committer:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitterDate: Sat, 09 Apr 2022 22:19:39 +02:00

timers: Simplify calc_index()

The level granularity round up of calc_index() does:

   (x + (1 << n)) >> n

which is obviously equivalent to

   (x >> n) + 1

but compilers can't figure that out despite the fact that the input range
is known to not cause an overflow. It's neither intuitive to read.

Just write out the obvious.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/87h778j46c.ffs@tglx

---
 kernel/time/timer.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timer.c b/kernel/time/timer.c
index 204d6cd..60aebf2 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timer.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timer.c
@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@ static inline unsigned calc_index(unsigned long expires, unsigned lvl,
 	 *
 	 * Round up with level granularity to prevent this.
 	 */
-	expires = (expires + LVL_GRAN(lvl)) >> LVL_SHIFT(lvl);
+	expires = (expires >> LVL_SHIFT(lvl)) + 1;
 	*bucket_expiry = expires << LVL_SHIFT(lvl);
 	return LVL_OFFS(lvl) + (expires & LVL_MASK);
 }

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ