[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220410171826.GB24453@wunner.de>
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2022 19:18:26 +0200
From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
Cc: peterhuewe@....de, jarkko@...nel.org, jgg@...pe.ca,
=robh+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stefanb@...ux.ibm.com, p.rosenberger@...bus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] tpm: tpm_tis_spi_slb_9670: implement set_reset and
unset_reset functions
On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 01:18:49PM +0200, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_slb9670.c
[...]
> +int slb9670_spi_unset_reset(struct tpm_tis_data *data)
[...]
> +int slb9670_spi_set_reset(struct tpm_tis_data *data)
[...]
> +static const struct tpm_tis_phy_ops slb9670_spi_phy_ops = {
> + .read_bytes = tpm_tis_spi_read_bytes,
> + .write_bytes = tpm_tis_spi_write_bytes,
> + .read16 = tpm_tis_spi_read16,
> + .read32 = tpm_tis_spi_read32,
> + .write32 = tpm_tis_spi_write32,
> + .set_reset = slb9670_spi_set_reset,
> + .unset_reset = slb9670_spi_unset_reset,
> +};
0-day is complaining that slb9670_spi_set_reset() / slb9670_spi_unset_reset()
are not declared static:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/202204081357.8SfjQosI-lkp@intel.com/
Thanks,
Lukas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists